“Darling, something is cracking.” – Maggie Gyllenhaal, The Bride
It’s easy to argue, watching the news over the last decade, that something needs to crack. We’re raising the right questions about racism, misogyny, and broken class structures, but as much hope as those questions give me, the thwarting of progress at every turn simply increases my rage. Somehow I didn’t realize how very angry I was until I watched The Bride with my husband this week on an all-too-rare date night. This review will contain spoilers, but I hope you will read it anyway, because there is no way anything I write will capture the strange energy of actually watching the film.
Who We Belong To
I didn’t think much about ownership and power structures in the films opening scenes as Ida becomes possessed by the ghost of Mary Shelley and starts acting out against her dinner companions (and general decorum) as Jessie Buckley does an extraordinary job of inhabiting three separate characters at once.
But the moment Ida is on the table waiting to be reanimated by Frank and Dr. Euphronius I found myself asking, “What fucking right do you have?” Because they didn’t. Just as Dr. Frankenstein didn’t have the right to make Frank.
One of the most successful parts of the movie is how Frank’s relationship to The Bride evolves from possession to admiration. Christian Bale does a beautiful job in this, portraying a character who is heartless and deeply pained at the same time, and he was able to inhabit a reverence of The Bride as she learned to inhabit herself that is aspirational. Frank loves The Bride as she is and as she will continue to grow.
Because of all of this, I was actually not in love with the scene where she proclaims herself “The Bride,” for the reason that a bride is always in relation to something else, a husband or wife. This insane, wild, powerful, uncontrollable character still defined herself in relation to another. Which is different than being in relationship with another. It felt limiting and the last thing I wanted to see was this character putting limits on herself. I mean, did she hurt anyone who didn’t deserve it?
Bartleby and the Art of Passive Resistance
I remember when Melville House reprinted Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener as part of their novella series. I hadn’t read the story before and I was so enchanted with the power that planting your feet in one place can hold that I bought the “I would prefer not to” tote bag and carried it around for years (until I realized it wasn’t a great look at work).
So I was delighted when The Bride started to quote Bartleby. At first it was a lark, but after the film was over, I realized how that passive resistance is sometimes the first power we feel like we can really hold. And, like a rooted tree, it is strong. It’s no longer my favorite kind of resistance (we have to actively make the change we want to see), but it’s not The Bride’s either, it’s merely an opening into the power she can begin to wield.
As good as this metaphor is, I couldn’t quite get over the wonder over whether the Bartleby timeline was right. Which worried my mind during the movie when I wanted to be fully in the fictional dream. Having looked it up today, I was right that Bartleby came out after Shelley died. But in a story like this, who knows, the ghost of Mary has probably been reading all the best books.
Things I didn’t Quite Get (This Watch)
Speaking of Mary Shelley, the interjections by her ghost did not always work for me. I was open to it at first and understood how her intrusion was shaping the actions and fate of Ida, but there were too many to start and it was a relief in the middle when they faded. There is a lot going on in this film (more on that in a moment) and Gyllenhaal artfully uses repetition to underscore a lot of her major points, so I am excited to see how the layers meld on rewatch.
And while the mob boss storyline helps with the pacing and gives some anchors for the plot, it felt like more than the movie needed. To lift it out would have required some deep reworking, but I would have loved to see what the film was like without this drag.
The Raw Power of Not Giving A Fuck
The Bride is loud, in every aspect off the word. The imagery is brash (often employing strange camera angles to further unsettle the audience), the music and plot are frenzied, and the acting is deliciously uncontained. I loved every bit of the raw feeling that imparts on the film. Of course it is not actually raw, it takes a great deal of work to put this many big things into a film and have them all (mostly) fit artfully. I wasn’t 100% there for how the movie came together, but I was 98% there and I can’t wait to see what Gyllenhaal does next.
Most of all, The Bride is a creature of impulse, and she is wild in her pursuits and her rage. While I don’t see myself painting my face black and going on a rampage, I sympathized with the women in the film who did, because we have held ourselves back too long.
I remember being told in the eighth grade by a creative writing teacher that I was a “very angry young woman,” and I wonder now why I let that be a rebuke. I was filled with all the surging emotions of a teenager and also reeling from years of fear and resentment around my mother’s illness. My teacher’s comments only made me more angry, but I also felt like I had to turn that anger inward, because I couldn’t make it go away, but I could hide it. This rage is what ultimately gave birth to my next book, Naked Driving to the Witches’ Graveyard, a project I can only dream of Gyllenhaal translating to the screen.
I am lucky in having the kind of husband who will ask me out on a Tuesday (arranging for the child care himself) to see a movie he knows I desperately want to see but that he really is not that interested in. Maybe next time I’ll be the kind of woman who asks him. Or a group of girlfriends. Maybe it’s time we all stood up and ran after the world we want to see.
I just realized I’ve never written here about An Ember in the Ashes or All My Rage, two projects that cemented Sabaa Tahir as one of my favorite living authors. Heir sits beside the Ember tetralogy, continuing the rich world in which deeply imagined characters fight across kingdoms that could easily be modern countries. The political strife is exacting and yet the fierceness with which Tahir imagines the humanity that cuts across it all makes these books both deeply engaging and must-reads for right now. I haven’t done a good job of explaining any of them because I don’t want to spoil the unfolding, but one person who read these books described them to me as “The first thing I’ve read in a very long time that made me care about the characters.” They are fast-paced and you can read them for pleasure, but they are also exquisitely crafted…
Speaking of roles and expectations, Ursula Hegi’s Stones from the River feels like a documentary of a small town in Germany starting near the end of World War I through the end of World War II. It’s filled with an entire town of characters who play against each other in the way that we do with our neighbors. Everyday things happen as the country’s descent into fascism plays out in the background. In fact, the first time I tried to read this book I found it so quotidian I had to put it down. This time I realized quotidian is the point.
On the subject of atrocities that go on too long, Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi is the most effective history of slavery I’ve ever read. This novel begins with the story of two half sisters born in Ghana in the eighteenth century. Through the parallel tracks for their descendants, Gyasi shares vignettes from each generation that highlight moments of cultural import. We experience the trajectories of colonialism in Ghana and slavery and racism in the U.S. Ghanaians wrestle with colonizers and tribal strife, people are enslaved, escape, get kidnapped, and work in indentured servitude. Families endure and are severed.
I’ve been sitting on a review copy of Steph Catudal’s Radicle, or When the World Lived Inside Us for ages. I think I was afraid of reading the book, which explores motherhood and losing a parent, because of what it would open for me. I was right about the feelings. I was wrong to wait to read it, because the sensory detail and her gentle attention to the experience of being human make this book worth returning to again and again.
What drew me to the series (beyond my husband’s recommendation) was how beautiful it is (and not just because they cast Lee Pace). The on-screen world is painterly (in one season expressly so as “Dusk” Cleon is actually painting the murals in his palace). What kept me there is the fascinating characters (especially Gaal Dornick and Salvor Hardin) and political machinations that made the world feel real and urgent. I kept thinking, “There must be so much more of this in the books! I must read the books!” I found the second two in a local Little Free Library, but it took me ages to actually order the first. What a surprise it was to finally read about this world I thought I knew.
The book is different. Not only is Gaal not a woman (almost no characters of consequence are), the character is incidental to the plot. In fact, most of the characters are incidental. As I was reading Foundation, I realized that part of what I’d loved about the series was the way the characters provided a touchstone for me as we hopped across planets and leapt forward in time over and over again. We lost a few of my favorites along the way, but there were always others I could lean on, knowing how their sympathies did and did not square with mine.
I have no interest in dogging on books that make lots of people happy but just aren’t my bag. But am interested in learning from these books, as something can be learned from anything. A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher was one of those books for me. Loaned to me by a beloved relative, I read the book even after I figured out I was the wrong reader, because I was interested in why the book didn’t work for me.
Speaking of political violence, which is on a lot of our minds lately, I found a copy of A Burning by Megha Majumdar at the Little Free Library and dove right in. I’m not quite done with this one but it was interesting to feel how differently I related to the characters in this story of a young woman (Jivan) in India who is imprisoned for a terrorist act she did not commit.
Some dystopias are fictional and I got the chance to revisit this classic by Ray Bradbury recently as my 10-year-old son picked it out as one of his birthday books. I can tell he’s exploring someone’s canon of great books because he checked Frankenstein out from the school library more than ten times last year (and it’s in our home again already this year—though I have offered to buy him a copy). He struggled in the beginning as he couldn’t tell what was metaphor and what was a mapping of an unfamiliar world (someday he’ll be the book reviewer, I tell ya), but I think we were both enriched by reading this book (and by watching the Simpson’s Treehouse of Terror takeoff, though picturing Montag as Homer did shift things a bit for me).
The book that rounds out the puzzle in my brain today is The Bat-Poet by Randall Jerrell, illustrated by Maurice Sendak. This simple story of a bat who is finding ways to himself through writing came to me by