When I was in high school, there was a certain type of person who read Isaac Asimov. I can picture one in particular: male, white, bowl cut, spent a lot of time smoking bowls on the industrial-sized trampoline in his back yard. Nice enough dude, but I didn’t fit the profile, so I didn’t read the books (to be fair, I was pretty deeply immersed in my Stephen Kings and Holocaust memoirs). I’m happy to say I’m less inhibited about reading books that aren’t “mine” these days, but this does mean I missed out on some really foundational books, like Asimov’s Foundation. In fact, I’m not even sure I really thought about the book until I started watching the series on Apple TV.
What drew me to the series (beyond my husband’s recommendation) was how beautiful it is (and not just because they cast Lee Pace). The on-screen world is painterly (in one season expressly so as “Dusk” Cleon is actually painting the murals in his palace). What kept me there is the fascinating characters (especially Gaal Dornick and Salvor Hardin) and political machinations that made the world feel real and urgent. I kept thinking, “There must be so much more of this in the books! I must read the books!” I found the second two in a local Little Free Library, but it took me ages to actually order the first. What a surprise it was to finally read about this world I thought I knew.
There will be spoilers ahead, if you can spoil a 75-year-old book and a series that debuted four years ago. There may also be misinformation as I’m going off my poor memory here. But I won’t say too much, because, as always, I most want you to get excited enough about this story to experience it for yourself.
Characters make a story
As I said, I was all in on Gaal Dornick as a character. Watching her float face up in the seas of her water-logged world. Seeing her absolute need for knowledge, a quest so intense it pulls her apart from her family, culture, and planet forever. Witnessing her stumble and triumph and stumble again as she comes into her own power.
Gaal was only one of the many characters we got to invest in in the series: Hari Seldon (the psychohistorian), Emperor Cleon (presented in the three forms of his cloned self-Dawn, Day, and Dusk), Demerzel (the woman who seems to make the Empire run), and Salvor Hardin (warden of Terminus and Gaal’s daughter). Each of these characters has an interesting backstory and a way of being in the narrative that drives the story forward. For example, Gaal is present as the Foundation is exiled from Trantor (the seat of Empire), her daughter is an integral part of the Foundation’s existence on Terminus, and Gaal becomes an important catalyst for the second Foundation.
Creating continuity across galaxies and lifetimes
The book is different. Not only is Gaal not a woman (almost no characters of consequence are), the character is incidental to the plot. In fact, most of the characters are incidental. As I was reading Foundation, I realized that part of what I’d loved about the series was the way the characters provided a touchstone for me as we hopped across planets and leapt forward in time over and over again. We lost a few of my favorites along the way, but there were always others I could lean on, knowing how their sympathies did and did not square with mine.
Without this continuity, I felt thrust into story line after story line without really knowing how to get my bearings. Whereas the series creates an entire history, this lack of continuity in the book provided me with outlines of what each stage of history was and could be, but I found it a lot harder to get inside (or to care).
Political evolutions
There’s also a stark difference between the series and the book in that we continue to experience the Empire in the series. That adds to the continuity of the story, but it also adds weight and context to what the Foundation is playing against. We didn’t have to see the whole history of Empire to imagine why it might decline (though we get touches in flashback). And when we flash forward, there’s context in what’s happened politically (and what’s about to happen) because we are grounded in both worlds. In the book, Empire (seemingly) ceases to exist over generations.
Also, the book feels much more jumpy. It wasn’t until near the end that I could pinpoint why (besides missing the characters), but I finally realized that each new crisis really sets a stage for Asimov to discuss a political system. When one of the characters calls the other a demagogue, it clicked—I felt like I was inside an Ayn Rand novel. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been deeply immersed in Rand’s work at various times in my life, and I’ve never been sorry I read it, but her work feels instructional, not narrative. The characters are often cardboard cutouts meant to push us forward to a conclusion Rand wants us to make.
I stopped reading Rand when I realized how little room there was for me in the books. One of the things I love about a book is bouncing myself off the ideas in conversation and coming away with my own thoughts. With Rand I could only agree or disagree. There wasn’t enough there for more.
I don’t think it’s an accident that Asimov and Rand share Russian lineage and a general time period. Their work both reads like they so forcefully need for us to believe something so we can change the world together. For me, though, I think the best way to change the world is to engage with the people around us, find out what they want changed about the world, and build a collective vision of what could be better.
I don’t know if I’ll read more Foundation books. I probably will just to see. I’m also off the series a bit after the most recent season. But believe me when I tell you that the first two seasons are gorgeous. Better yet, watch them for yourself!
If you want to read Asimov for yourself, order Foundation from Bookshop.org. If you use that link to purchase anything, you’re keeping indie bookstores in business and I receive a commission.
I have no interest in dogging on books that make lots of people happy but just aren’t my bag. But am interested in learning from these books, as something can be learned from anything. A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher was one of those books for me. Loaned to me by a beloved relative, I read the book even after I figured out I was the wrong reader, because I was interested in why the book didn’t work for me.
Speaking of political violence, which is on a lot of our minds lately, I found a copy of A Burning by Megha Majumdar at the Little Free Library and dove right in. I’m not quite done with this one but it was interesting to feel how differently I related to the characters in this story of a young woman (Jivan) in India who is imprisoned for a terrorist act she did not commit.
Some dystopias are fictional and I got the chance to revisit this classic by Ray Bradbury recently as my 10-year-old son picked it out as one of his birthday books. I can tell he’s exploring someone’s canon of great books because he checked Frankenstein out from the school library more than ten times last year (and it’s in our home again already this year—though I have offered to buy him a copy). He struggled in the beginning as he couldn’t tell what was metaphor and what was a mapping of an unfamiliar world (someday he’ll be the book reviewer, I tell ya), but I think we were both enriched by reading this book (and by watching the Simpson’s Treehouse of Terror takeoff, though picturing Montag as Homer did shift things a bit for me).
The book that rounds out the puzzle in my brain today is The Bat-Poet by Randall Jerrell, illustrated by Maurice Sendak. This simple story of a bat who is finding ways to himself through writing came to me by
I can’t recall where I read about Barkskins, but as the daughter of a forester, the idea of reading about how timber has shaped our nation appealed to me. The book follows two (entwined, at times) families, one Mi’kmaw and one French from 1693 until almost the present day (though I haven’t reached actual nationhood for either the U.S. or Canada) as settlers clear the newly “discovered” land, first for the value of the timber, then for the sake of clearing.
In Brooklyn, Eilis is an intelligent young woman in post-war Ireland with very few prospects. Jobs are scarce and most of the energy of the young women in her village centers around getting married. Eilis is given the chance to move to Brooklyn where she encounters a whole new booming world. She has a job with the potential to move up, she has an education, there isn’t even (in the beginning) a marriage market to speak of. And there are exciting new goods to be bought for herself and her loved ones back home. All of her waking hours go to working or going to school, to the extent that I wondered how she would have time to build friendships or romantic relationships at all (I really was exhausted at times reading about the hours she kept, but also she didn’t have kids and I forget what that’s like).
My son has a book called There Must Be More Than That! by Shinsuke Yoshitake that’s all about choices. At the end the mom offers the daughter two types of eggs and the girl blows up, “Not just boiled or fried! There are more ways to make an egg than that!” and then lists dozens of other options. I love this book with all my heart because it reminds me how much we narrow our lives by just choosing between what we’ve seen before.
No one embraces and embodies the complexity better than Edan Lepucki, and Woman No. 17 delves deeper and with more nuance into the mother-child relationship than anything I’ve read in a long time. Motherhood is an obsession for Lepucki. From
I first heard of Mary Louise Kelly’s It. Goes. So. Fast.: The Year of No Do-Overs on the radio, duh, as NPR is often playing in my home and she is the much loved host of All Things Considered. I remember laughing at her anecdote about the school nurse calling her when she was on the tarmac in Iraq, insisting that she come and get her son. I remember also relating to the deep push-pull that inhabited her interview (and this book) between living for your children and living for yourself. That sounds selfish to me when I type it, and maybe that’s part of the problem as I’ve been trying for all these years to figure out how to be myself and a mother and an artist and a wife and sometimes Corporate Barbie. It’s a lot. It’s so much less, even, than Kelly is doing, and I loved having this insight into her world and her thought process.