The morning after I finished reading Show Yourself by Shane Pollard, I heard the news that a 15-year-old girl had been dragged from a bus stop and raped in the woods less than a mile from my house. Too apt for a book that starts with a strange man chasing an 11-year-old down an alley, and I’ll admit that this intrusion of reality colored how I remember Show Yourself.
Danger Lurks
Child of the 1980s, the idea that there’s a stranger lurking in the bushes is very familiar to me. Crime stats be damned, the way our human brains assess risk (there’s an excellent Hidden Brain on this) means I carry this fear whenever I go anywhere. The visceral way Pollard captures Jenavieve’s situation in the opening pages of Show Yourself tells me I’m not alone. The craft behind this is precise, from using strong verbs (cowering) to details (“rusted dumpster, amongst the dirty runoff and the smell of wet asphalt”) just specific enough to convey an ugly, if not unfamiliar, environment without drawing attention away from the action.
I’m not spoiling anything by saying the stranger ends up (physically) harming Jenavieve’s father instead of her, reflexively stabbing James to death as James tries to protect his little girl. Here Pollard amps up the poignancy (and the omnipresence of danger) by flashing back and forth between what must have happened in the alley and the merry group of friends Jenavieve and James had been part of immediately before.
All this in the first three pages.
Point of View Affects Everything
So far I’ve written about Jenavieve and James, but the book is not really about either of them. The book is about the narrator, Tristan, James’ friend and Jenavieve’s “uncle.” Pollard very clearly structures the book this way, using not just Tristan’s first-person point of view, but also going so far as to start the book with the word “My.” It’s a valid choice, and the events of the book would unfold very differently if he had chosen a different POV character (11-year-olds might feel a lot of agency in the world, but their effectiveness is limited by societal constraints). Regardless of whether Pollard had chosen third person or third, he was going to have to stick close to Tristan to investigate the nature of vengeance.
The one flaw in this is that sometimes Jenavieve gets lost on the story. Maybe it’s because I’m a mom or because the news keeps newsing, I wanted more of what was happening with the girl: how was she coping? who was actually caring for her? is she waking up in the middle of the night wondering what would have happened if? Some of these questions are answered obliquely (Tristan takes custody, she spends many nights with Mike and his family—the rest of their party from that fateful night). And Mike and Kristen (Mike’s wife) do remind Tristan from time to time that he’s responsible to Jenavieve’s actual wellbeing, not just for avenging her father. But the effect of centering the narrative on Tristan is that the story can be as blind to the real victim as he is.
Revenge?
The tagline for this book is, “This is not a revenge story.” Which is an interesting choice for a book about one man’s obsession with retribution. But maybe that’s because the story does also become about how Tristan himself gets lost inside his quest. He lets his obligations to Jenavieve slide, fails to maintain his business, and sometimes (accidentally) creates situations where he could be mistaken for the kind of creeper he’s trying to rid the world of. It affects his friendships, too, as he tries to recruit Mike but Mike refuses to set aside his whole life for this one purpose.
Still, Tristan drive and actions push the plot forward and the action revolves around tracking down the perp to make him pay. The action is swift and fast-paced, even when Tristan is stymied in his search, which makes the book a fast read.
Literary Thriller
Don’t read too fast, though, because (as I described earlier), this book is finely crafted. The relationships between characters flow naturally (with more than one character offering a chance to challenge Tristan’s view of them), events unfold in unpredictable (but not unbelievable) ways, and the sentences are spare without being terse.
Show Yourself is the best kind of thriller—the book you reach for because you just want to lose yourself in a more just world for a few hours but also a book that ends up stretching your thinking along the way.
Closer to home, they caught the guy who assaulted the little girl in my neighborhood. I don’t know who or how she is, but I can only hope that she is surrounded by people who love her as fiercely as James, Tristan, Mike, and Kristen loved Jenavieve in this book.
My uncle, one of the most faithful readers of this blog, recommended this book to me very soon after it was published and I rushed out and bought it this last week when it finally reached paperback. The book revolves primarily around Anne, Serk, and their daughter Louisa. Anne and Serk are both estranged from their families which makes for the small microcosm of a family where people can really push each other’s buttons. I won’t go too far into the story (Serk disappears from the beach one night in Japan, leaving a young Louisa drowning on the shore and Anne and Louisa suffer estrangement as well) because Choi beautifully weaves us back and forth in time to illustrate other parts of the family (and extended family) dynamics in a way that can only be properly experienced by reading the book yourself.
Thunder Song, by contrast, is a collection of essays by Pacific Northwest writer Sasha taqʷšəblu LaPointe. I’d seen reviews for her previous book, Red Paint: The Ancestral Autobiography of a Coast Salish Punk but never gotten around to reading it. But this week I was stuck on an essay of my own and so I picked up Thunder Song to see what it could teach me about form. Instead, the essays were so engrossing in their own right that a structural read will have to wait. LaPointe writes on subjects from Native healing to the feminist punk scene, miscarriage and abuse, and I felt myself wishing our paths had crossed at some point in our Pacific Northwest lives, because we are a similar age and I think we’d have a lot to talk about.
I was interested in Kairos because the relationship between the young Katharina and the much older Hans takes place in East Berlin and then persists over decades as the Soviet Union unravels. What I did not know was how far into the psyche Erpenbeck would take me with this novel. The book starts HOT. Hans and Katharina meet an are drawn to each other with the obsessive longing of teenagers (except that Hans is 34 years her senior and married with a child):
A monastery is, of course, a natural setting to seek serenity and a slower pace of life. Smith’s beautiful descriptions of the lives of monks in 16th century England gave me a model to strive for as I’m remaking my own life and (literally) planting our garden anew for the next season. Depictions of monastic life aren’t new to my library, but there’s something about the spareness of the form and space constraints Smith was working with that let air into the work in a way that The Name of the Rose could not. And I found peace in the ordered life, much in the way I’ve found peace in
Given that I first learned of bell hooks at my hippie grad school where we all read Teaching to Transgress, it’s odd that this is the book I most quoted on LinkedIn this week. Odd, except that there’s something about Art on My Mind that spoke so deeply to the creative maker in me that I wanted to share the balm of her words in that awful den of capitalism we feel compelled to show up at every day but that brings few of us any joy (or jobs, TBH).
In a very different vein, I also found inspiration in the forthcoming Lady No, a collection of blog posts by Korean poet Kim Hyesoon that originally appeared anonymously on a Korean publisher’s website in 2014. The posts themselves are eclectic, often taking place in a country called Aerok (Korea spelled backwards if you are also sleep-deprived). Some are stories and some poems. Most are uncategorizable, and it took awhile for my brain to open to what Kim was creating by writing them. Translator Jack Saebyok Jung writes of working at “preserving Kim’s fierce strangeness,” which I gradually learned to appreciate. I’m still unpacking the layers of the work, but she touches on topics including loneliness, motherhood, and authoritarianism— you know, my usual trifecta.
I’m well acquainted with the choral narration of some Greek stories—it’s actually something I’m using in Naked Driving to the Witches’ Graveyard, the book I’m finishing up right now—but telling Medea’s story from within an anonymous mass of voices would defeat the point. Instead, she provides myriad individual voices in No Friend to This House. The story is almost entirely told from the alternating points of view of women, including Alcimede, Aphrodite, Hypsiple, Hera, Glauke, and, of course, Medea.