My little filmmaker often wants to see a movie to celebrate his last day of school. This year we had the pleasure of seeing Disclosure Day and, after leaving the movie in the silence that follows something that really touches you, I felt compelled to re-watch Close Encounters of the Third Kind and think through some of the things Steven Spielberg is wrestling with and what he wants to tell us. There will be no spoilers here, just me on a journey to understand the humanity and art behind all of it.
Spielberg as Filmmaker
I am a fan of Spielberg’s, but not a super fan. Unlike my ten-year-old son, I cannot name off a list of his credits without having IMDB actually in front of me, but I’ve watched (and enjoyed) most of the things he’s made. More importantly (and selfishly) his vision for the world was omnipresent in my childhood. E.T. the Extraterrestrial was probably my first exposure to his work and we still watched and re-watched Indiana Jones films on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray (sometimes streaming if no one wants to go find the Blu-ray). Close Encounters was made the year before I was born, but you couldn’t grow up in the 80s and not see it somewhere. His work was so ubiquitous I didn’t even think about the craft behind it until watching The Fabelmans last year (and having my son watch the first half so he could see what he might be in for in the future).
Because there is art in all of this, and it’s no accident he captured our hearts, minds and screens. I think I sensed this with films like Empire of the Sun (which my son hasn’t watched, but there are days I can whistle “Suo Gan” and place myself directly inside certain scenes—hey, is Spielberg the genesis of my obsession with World War II?). Together with Saving Private Ryan and Schindler’s List, these are the films where I start to see the work behind the movie (in a good way) and not just be (only) swept away by the story.
Parallels between Close Encounters and Disclosure Day
I’m not educated enough in the language of film to really break it down (this isn’t the medium where I want to go too far behind the curtain, at least until my son takes me there), but there are strong threads that link Close Encounters with Disclosure Day, ways of framing a view, finding and tuning an emotional pitch (overwhelming us only to pull back hard and let us linger in a single moment).
Last night we were all in awe of the things Spielberg does with practical effects in Close Encounters. I wanted like hell to remember all the images in the montage reveal in Disclosure Day to see if any of those moments made it. Both films can definitely exist in the same universe. And there are crossovers in multilingual communication, people who are compelled or called (and their unbelieving partners), faith in general, the general shape of aliens, trains, tyrannical restraint (one government, one not, which is interesting in itself) and, of course, road trips!
And then there’s the kids. I won’t talk about the parallels here, but IYKYK and if you don’t, go watch Disclosure Day.
The Boy Inside Spielberg
Many have written about the way Spielberg centers a child’s view, and it works, that re-experiencing of the world. For me, it’s also part of the magic of parenthood, because you get to see things fresh and hard and unfiltered and to remember how something small (or big) can shape you forever in ways you may not later remember. Like how the mania Richard Dreyfuss displays in Close Encounters echoes Michelle Williams’ in The Fablemans.
What touched me deeply in The Fablemans was the way the boy was traumatized by the train crash in The Greatest Show on Earth and went home to act it out over and over until he was (mostly) in control of this. I’d love to do a deep dive on trains in Spielberg movies soon, but last night I definitely noticed when Richard Dreyfuss was playing with a toy train in his living room. And that he’s stopped in front of train tracks during a pivotal scene. In Disclosure Day, there is a train scene as well, and I squeezed my husband’s hand so tight as we watched that scene because I could feel myself inside the experience of that little boy still tugging and and playing with the thing that scared him so much, that he knew could scare us too. I dare say this one was the pinnacle of that. I don’t know if I (or my husband’s hand) could handle another. It was awe-inspiring and also I ached for him.
The Artist with Something to Say
It’s that empathetic conveyance that really makes Spielberg an artist. His ability to be in touch with the humanity in himself and to reach out and demand (or beg) us to be in touch with our own. It’s something I experienced when I was pregnant and in the months post-partum—the ability to see all humans for their basic humanity—it was inspiring, empowering, and overwhelming but it changed me in the best of ways. Empathy is gently the subject of Close Encounters and more explicitly (along with faith) in Disclosure Day. And I get it. It’s also what gives me hope, because we need connection right now. With each other, with our own humanity. We need to listen.

My son has a Disclosure Day poster ready to hang on his wall. He hasn’t seen Empire of the Sun yet, but I don’t think he’ll get through the summer without watching it. We’ve been trying to protect his tender heart until he might be ready. Because I hope his heart stays tender in some ways for his whole life, despite how hard this can sometimes be. It worked for Spielberg.
The morning after I finished reading Show Yourself by Shane Pollard, I heard the news that a
My uncle, one of the most faithful readers of this blog, recommended this book to me very soon after it was published and I rushed out and bought it this last week when it finally reached paperback. The book revolves primarily around Anne, Serk, and their daughter Louisa. Anne and Serk are both estranged from their families which makes for the small microcosm of a family where people can really push each other’s buttons. I won’t go too far into the story (Serk disappears from the beach one night in Japan, leaving a young Louisa drowning on the shore and Anne and Louisa suffer estrangement as well) because Choi beautifully weaves us back and forth in time to illustrate other parts of the family (and extended family) dynamics in a way that can only be properly experienced by reading the book yourself.
Thunder Song, by contrast, is a collection of essays by Pacific Northwest writer Sasha taqʷšəblu LaPointe. I’d seen reviews for her previous book, Red Paint: The Ancestral Autobiography of a Coast Salish Punk but never gotten around to reading it. But this week I was stuck on an essay of my own and so I picked up Thunder Song to see what it could teach me about form. Instead, the essays were so engrossing in their own right that a structural read will have to wait. LaPointe writes on subjects from Native healing to the feminist punk scene, miscarriage and abuse, and I felt myself wishing our paths had crossed at some point in our Pacific Northwest lives, because we are a similar age and I think we’d have a lot to talk about.
I was interested in Kairos because the relationship between the young Katharina and the much older Hans takes place in East Berlin and then persists over decades as the Soviet Union unravels. What I did not know was how far into the psyche Erpenbeck would take me with this novel. The book starts HOT. Hans and Katharina meet an are drawn to each other with the obsessive longing of teenagers (except that Hans is 34 years her senior and married with a child):
A monastery is, of course, a natural setting to seek serenity and a slower pace of life. Smith’s beautiful descriptions of the lives of monks in 16th century England gave me a model to strive for as I’m remaking my own life and (literally) planting our garden anew for the next season. Depictions of monastic life aren’t new to my library, but there’s something about the spareness of the form and space constraints Smith was working with that let air into the work in a way that The Name of the Rose could not. And I found peace in the ordered life, much in the way I’ve found peace in
Given that I first learned of bell hooks at my hippie grad school where we all read Teaching to Transgress, it’s odd that this is the book I most quoted on LinkedIn this week. Odd, except that there’s something about Art on My Mind that spoke so deeply to the creative maker in me that I wanted to share the balm of her words in that awful den of capitalism we feel compelled to show up at every day but that brings few of us any joy (or jobs, TBH).
In a very different vein, I also found inspiration in the forthcoming Lady No, a collection of blog posts by Korean poet Kim Hyesoon that originally appeared anonymously on a Korean publisher’s website in 2014. The posts themselves are eclectic, often taking place in a country called Aerok (Korea spelled backwards if you are also sleep-deprived). Some are stories and some poems. Most are uncategorizable, and it took awhile for my brain to open to what Kim was creating by writing them. Translator Jack Saebyok Jung writes of working at “preserving Kim’s fierce strangeness,” which I gradually learned to appreciate. I’m still unpacking the layers of the work, but she touches on topics including loneliness, motherhood, and authoritarianism— you know, my usual trifecta.